Your toll tales
PUBLISHED: 14:10 27 November 2008 | UPDATED: 15:44 25 August 2010
OVERWHELMING support for our sister paper s campaign to ditch the toll on the Dartford crossing has prompted the Bexley Times to call on our readers to have their say.
OVERWHELMING support for our sister paper's campaign to ditch the toll on the Dartford crossing has prompted the Bexley Times to call on our readers to have their say.
More than 200 of you have signed our online petition or sent in coupons supporting our Stop The Toll campaign.
Many more have written in to express support for our campaign.
Here are just a few of your letters...
Fiasco reminds me of Mad Hatter's Tea Party
THE increase is totally without any justification and will only cause more congestion and longer delays - which are already beyond belief - constantly appearing on all of the traffic reports.
The whole situation is a complete fiasco and reminds me of the Mad Hatter's Tea Party. Who makes the decisions? Have they ever sat in their car waiting to pay the toll? The amount of wasted time, fuel and increase in frustration, apart from the overall effect on the environment, is beyond belief - clearly this is of no concern when the
opportunity of increasing revenue is so tempting. It sadly boils down to the fact that the crossing is a big money making machine used by a captive audience and no other considerations, like the effect on the environment, will be listened to.
Abolish the tolls and help save the environment and improve the lives of all who live in the immediate area and of all those who need to use the M25. The current situation is unbearable and with the 50 per cent increase it will became impossible. Woolwich Ferry here I come!
CLIVE EDWARDS, BY EMAIL
Scandalous toll queues
THE continuation of charges should have been challenged, perhaps in the High Court, when the tunnel was finished. The money will go other parts of the country? We were told that it would be spent on local traffic schemes. But even this can be a scam - even if it is so spent, the authorities can then contribute that much less, and end up with an equivalent amount saved to spend on what they wish. The current scandalous queues are due to insufficient toll booths - more should be provided. If Le Tunnel won't do this, they should be compelled to allow the traffic through free and unhindered as soon as the queue length time exceeds a set length, say five minutes.
No tolls mean less congestion, not more
I WAS one of those unfortunate enough to have to use the Dartford crossing twice on Monday, 17 November, being the first weekday operation of the new crossing tolls. I can certainly confirm that the queues going north in the morning were back to the A2 and those in the late afternoon coming south were back to junction 29, a distance of over six miles. I find the argument that without tolls 17 per cent more traffic would try to use the Dartford crossing leading to more congestion entirely spurious. Without tolls there would be a total of eight unrestricted lanes crossing the river between Kent and Essex, which should easily cope with such an increase in traffic. The transfer of long distance traffic to the Dartford crossing following a removal of tolls would most probably also serve to reduce congestion on the A2, A12 and A127 into London as well as at the Blackwall Tunnel.
Everyone would seem to benefit, even those not regularly using the Dartford crossing.
ANY new projects should be ultimately paid for out of the money already collected by the government. What a shame no one seems to be able to stop this Highway Robbery.
Dick Turpin would have been proud of this government.
Milking a cash cow
I TEND to take the, perhaps cynical, view that in situations like this (e.g. London Congestion Charge) where there is a cash cow that's tethered (i.e. the motorist who has little or no other practical alternative) then the government will continue to milk it.
The amount of money involved is, for them, just too tempting to ignore.
I believe your newspaper should be pressuring for the complete abolition of the tolls, perhaps by phasing it in for cars first, then commercial vehicles later and or by extending the current free night time period for all traffic.
Anyway, please keep up the campaigning
Where's the money?
THE crossing is nothing more than a licence to print money for this money-grabbing government. The tolls should be removed as promised when the crossing was paid for (2003) but like 99 per cent of politicians' promises they fail to deliver. I believe the crossing takes in something like £200,000 a day, where does this money go?
STAN EARL, BY EMAIL
Greedy money suckers
WHO are the greedy money suckers kidding? Just keep dishing the dosh, never mind the queues.
If they really wanted a free flowing traffic situation, do away with the tolls altogether, as was promised upon the opening.
No one listened to us
YOU are right to highlight the unfairness of the new tolling regime, and I have had a number of constituents contact my office to express their anger at the rise.
Earlier this year, I campaigned for Bexley to be included in the local discount scheme that had been proposed for Dartford and Thurrock residents, raising the issue with Ministers in the House of Commons and through correspondence. Many of my constituents in Crayford, Slade Green and Erith live closer to the crossing than many in both Dartford and Thurrock.
However, the government were again not interested in listening to the views of the people of Bexley.
DAVID EVENNETT, MP FOR BEXLEYHEATH AND CRAYFORD